Enable safe GenAI without permanent deferral
Move from restricting AI expansion to governing it — with infrastructure security and legal can sign before procurement closes.
CISO
Enable the AI usage your team can sign off on.
Parable gives CISOs governance infrastructure for safe enterprise AI — through Privacy, Policies, and Protection, with data minimization, audit trails, and no model training on customer data.
Contain shadow AI inside the perimeter
Employees are already pasting sensitive content into public LLMs. You need visibility and a governed alternative, not another policy memo.
Protect workplace activity data end to end
Who worked on what, when, and with whom is sensitive — from litigation and M&A exposure to vendor training risk.
Two risk categories, one conversation
Data exposure risk in workplace activity
Operational context reveals collaboration patterns that are rational to protect — and expensive when they leak.
Vendor AI training risk is the default assumption
Security review starts from the belief that enterprise data trains models. That assumption must be answered explicitly, not buried in terms.
Shadow AI with no shared visibility
Unsanctioned tools, browser extensions, and copilots spread faster than IT can inventory — each reopening the same review cycle.
How Parable answers it — by name
- 01
Privacy — Signal without Surveillance
Privacy aggregates workplace context without employee-level PII. Customer-managed encryption keys and BYOC deployment when blast-radius and residency control matter.
- 02
Policies — governed access you can audit
Policies delivers custom roles, OIDC with SCIM provisioning, and data-access controls — the RBAC and audit-trail evidence you hand legal before procurement closes.
- 03
Protection — posture you can cite in review
Protection connects SOC 2 and ISO-aligned controls to deployment architecture. Customer data is never used to train models — stated in product and contract, not buried in FAQs.
Product & platform
Parable surfaces CISOs sign off on
Privacy, Policies, and Protection are live today.
Privacy
Workplace context without employee-level PII; customer-managed keys and BYOC when residency matters.
Policies
RBAC, OIDC/SCIM, and audit trails — governance infrastructure, not a policy PDF.
Protection
SOC 2 / ISO posture plus an explicit no-training-on-customer-data commitment for review packets.
Who signs off with you
Technical Leaders
Platform architecture, integration, and production patterns — what the CIO builds and what you approve.
CHRO
Shared privacy architecture for workforce context — organizational patterns without individual surveillance.
Executive Office
Consolidated visibility into distributed AI spend — including shadow use finance is already funding.
What the CIO builds, what you sign off on
Security review only shortens when platform teams and executives share the same governance evidence, not the same policy deck.
CIO / CTO
Production-grade context and integration paths that clear review before pilots stall.
CHRO
Workforce data handled with minimization and purpose limitation both functions defend.
CFO
Shadow AI and sanctioned spend in one picture — so cost and risk land in the same review.
What we hear
We were stuck in the same security questionnaire on every pilot. Once we could show Parable Privacy and Policies in the architecture — and Protection in the contract — review stopped being the reason deals died in procurement.
64%
of CISOs say enabling safe GenAI use is a top priority over the next two years
Proofpoint, Voice of the CISO 2025